’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
3 Attachment(s)
’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Here is a photo of a ZR-1 Dana 60. GM appears to have cast a special housing for this car. It bolts right up to the C-beam bridging forward to the transmission tailshaft. However, the batwing is completely different other than the bolt patterning being the same. The yokes coming out of the case are different length left and right. So the half shafts would also be different lengths. I am guessing to deal with torque steer. Other than adapting the yokes somehow the main case is bolt in. I have not checked the gear ratios, but the Dana 60 is numerically higher than the Dana 44 that came out of my ’89 L98 car. So I would think the tune in the chip is adjusted. Any thoughts out there about using the 60 or the 44 in a street driven car? BTW This is not an active car rear end. The third photo is of one of those. George |
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Didn't the prototypes have 3.54 vs the 3.45?
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
I measured it, carefully. 3:54 George.
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
It would be interesting to remove the cover and post the ring gear information from the gear. Snapshots are sometimes deceptive but that housing doesn't appear to be tall enough to house a 248mm ring gear. What is the height of the rear top of cover to bottom of cover.
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Quote:
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Quote:
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Quote:
3:54 Rear Ends The following information provided by Gordon Killebrew. It was originally released for cars going to the European market because of low noise level requirements. It was not an option you could order. It was automatically a 3.54 axle instead of a 3.45 when going to a Country that required this. From the start of production in 1988 (MY89) to 01/01/89, all 6-speeds had a 3.54 axle. After 01/01/89 the ZR-1s used a 3.45 axle. The L98 6-speeds used a 3.31 axle. The 3.54 axle was not EPA certified in 90-92 because it went to the European area market. In 1990 the L98 & LT5 6-speeds used a 3.45 except the GHO code with a 8.5 ring gear. The are no records for how many, and there were no break points. They were produced as ordered. I doubt that any went to the country of Switzerland due to their noise level requirements. Most ZR1's did not meet their requirements. There were some sent to England. RPO for 3.45 and 3.54 GH0----Rear Axle, 3.54 Ratio GM3----Rear Axle, 3.45 Ratio EXP----Export A true Dana 60 with its 9-3/4" ring gear would be quite beefy indeed. |
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
2 Attachment(s)
Below are the two build sheets for the cars.
First is from the donor '89-L98 car. The car came with a 6-speed. It was also built for Chevy Engineering. 3.54 ratio is listed on the build sheet. Second is from the donor '89-LT5 car. This car also came with a 3.54. Now I am just going to need to open up the case that is on the floor of the garage to see what is inside in terms of a Dana 44, Dana 60 or something else. I assume that the rear was installed by the engineering guys after the car went down the assembly line. George |
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
Cool stuff, George!
|
Re: ’89-10 Dana 60 rear end
4 Attachment(s)
Okay WVZR-1, you called it. I came home a bit early from work today (the 405 freeway sucks at 5:30) and sliced open the two pumpkins. Both had the same ring sets, Dana 44 with 3.54 ratios.
The differences are: that the prototype case is thicker, stiffer that the stock case; the half-shafts are uneven length with constant velocity joints; and the mounting to the chassis of the car is different. I think I will refit the prototype case with stock half-shafts and install it in the car. The bat wing fits. The stock case is on the photo on the left. George |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020