Re: 4.10 gears...not what I expected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fully Vetted
I thought you might be. It feels like the car went on about a 500 lb diet. Very froggy and eager to run.
Paul, I think with modded motors like ours the taller gears are fine. That's why I did 3.90's vs 4.10's. We have the power to pull those tall gears in 1st and 2nd. For the same reason if I added boost I would never do 3.90's or 4.10's. Don't need to. Shorter gears are a great equalizer when you are short on power. IMHO, the more power you have the less gear you need.
|
Dave, I have come to agree with much of your (and Dom's) opinion. I too am starting to lean toward the 3.90s as having favor between the 4.10 and 3.90 ratios. Fact is, I just LOVE that 2nd gear/90 mph roll-out...and the resulting look on a few ricer's and LS drivers' faces...priceless!
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez!
90 #1202
"FBI" top end ported & relieved
Cam timing by "Pete the Greek"
Sans secondaries
Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive
SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs
Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry
|