Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Having already gone through an ECM issue, and of course wondering about the DIS (anyone have a spare on their shelf they don't need?), threads related to these always end up with references to Megasquirt. However, I've yet to see a thread that goes into the whole process of swapping to it.
So, my questions are: 1) what's involved in doing the swap? How many hours for a competent mechanic to it? 2)Aside from the Megasquirt 3 (?) controller, what is needed to make this work? 3) What are the costs of getting everything? 4) What instrument panel functionality do we lose? 5) How is reliability of the system? 6) What questions do I not know to ask about it? Looking forward to getting educated. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
I think RussMcB had one. You should reach out to him. Or call MegaSquirt directly.
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Talking to Russ too. Pretty good feedback from him. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
It is my understanding that with the mega squirt you can use the factory dis for plug and play operation. The mega squirt also has additional outputs that you could setup to run individual coils for each cylinder and not utilize the factory DIS and coils. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
I thought I read something like that. Gonna reach out to the good folks at Megasquirt for some clarification too. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
base ms3 pro is about 1100 with the fly wiring that you need to install
you essentially take away all the engine management functions and there are issues with interfaces for mileage computer, security, ect... gauges work fine. you for sure WANT to run coil on plug and I think the ecotec 4 turbo coils or the merc marine coils plug in perfectly the megasquirt can drive the 16 injectors fine and has dual wideband, flex fuel capability, and a wide range of boost control and tuning features that make it a very good option for anyone that has "lost the dis" the LT5 ignition system is quite good, and works fine, but since they are going up in price, the MS is a viable alternative. The raptor "plug and play" version retains the stock ignition system which I wasn't fond of as selling a "good DIS" will about pay off the megasquirt I'm looking to do this, as the tuning opportunities are significant and the coil on plug is superior and much less hassle to maintain. If anyone needs a DIS, reach out to me. I have one off my 95 and would for sure pass it on for the right price to a needy owner. Jerry is working on reverse engineering and will likely have a solution soon, and fortunately the DIS rarely fails. But when confronted with that, know that there are options!!! |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Ron,
Ur saying the Ecotec COP fit correctly in the plug well? U got part #s? Of course u?ll still need to do a crank trigger unless u r saying MS will use the LT-5 crank signal. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
The MS PRO natively reads the existing 8+1 crank signal.
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
The DIYautotune plug and play version is 2400-2700 dollars. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
With some people asking almost 2k for reman. ECUs, it's only a matter of time until these get more popular. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
regular ecotec turbo 4 coil. It sticks up just about 1/8 too tall so a rubber spacer would make it snug the raptor plug and play version continues to use the DIS which is silly. the MS3 pro will drive the injectors, coils, dual wb, alchy system, flex fuel, and just about anything you can imagine. You do sacrifice some minor stuff in the CCM like fuel mileage computer and security control (you can keep it!!) and this would be a full custom install that has not been done yet on a ZR-1. But it's fairly clear on cutting in the fly harness to take away all engine control from the stock ecm and turn off the codes in the memcal. I would love to just do one standalone style without the DIS box as the dis alone would pay for the ms3 investment to get started. If anyone is in serious need of a DIS, look me up, so I can get started. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
There is a tt zr1 using ms3 to control engine,boost functions with the stock ecm keeping CCM functions happy.
Works great. Graham |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Is the MS3 also taking over the DIS functions? |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
No DIS in place.
Graham |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
do tell!! who did the install. You KNOW I'm jonsing (for life it seems) to get my hands on a TT ZR-1
I think the MS3 Pro is in my future with COP thanks for chiming in Graham, good to know that someone has already gone there!! I'm wanting to do a MS3 pro on a c5 too. They even have a Micro squirt that will serve as a tranny controller for a 4l60 slushbox the MS is getting more advanced all the time and doing very well in the turbo cars. Look up a guy named Denmah on the forums and he pioneered the "sloppy mechanics" you tubers with some very good free tech to get you started on the MS3 pro he's slapped some old truck motors together and slapped them in ugly old ford fairmonts and rustangs and gone very fast for very cheap. You'd laugh at these hoopties until they spank your @$$ These are 8 and 9 second "truck bombs" that haul the mail. I used to laugh at them until they showed me tail lights in all my expensive stuff. Now I drank the cool aid and I'm cranking out turbo truck motors. the little alum ls 4.8/5.3 block is pretty strong so I'll be trying one out in the c5 turbo car and go up to around 1200 from the 800 I'm at now. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
LPE install
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
The issue with a standalone on the LT5 is the shear number of outputs required to drive everything. I haven?t researched the MS3, but driving 16 injectors plus 8 individual coils, plus a 4-wire stepper, plus ..... there are a lot of outputs needed. You?re not likely to be able to do all of that with a budget ecu. Waste spark helps (reduces 4 outputs). You could conceivably run the injectors in parallel, and fire PRI and sec at the same time. Buts that?s a bigger current draw on the drivers. Inputs are never the limiting factor in my experience. You need to add up all the things (outputs) you need to control and find an ecu that has that capacity. There aren?t many.
Sent from my iPhone using ZR-1 Net Registry |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Just to summarize, the LT5 ECU controls the following outputs. Anyone considering an aftermarket unit should be sure all of these (at least the ones that are important to you) are supported.
8 x Primary injector drivers (low-side) 4 x Secondary injector drivers (low-side), if using the OE secondary relay modules, otherwise 8 for individual injector control 1 x Ignition "bypass" signal to factory ign module 1 x Electronic Spark Control (timing signal) to factory ign module 4 x IAC Stepper motor 1 x Vehicle Speed output (low-side PWM) 2 x Fuel Pump drives (high-side) 1 x Shift Lamp (low-side) 1 x "1-4" upshift relay (low-side) 1 x "1-4" upshift lamp (low-side) 1 x AIR injection motor relay (low-side) 2 x fan control (low-side) 1 x Cannister Purge (low-side) 1 x Malfunction Indicator Lamp (low-side) 1 x A/C Clutch (low-side) 1 x Secondary Port throttle Solenoid (low-side) 1 x AIR injection solenoid (low-side) 2 x Serial Communications Total of 34. If you want to eliminate the stock Ignition Module, which it seems most do, add 2 to run wasted-spark, or add 6 to run COP/CNP. From what I can tell, the MS3 can only drive a max of 12 injectors, so they must be using the stock secondary injector relays. And we know they are using the stock Ignition module, although it can run up to 8 ignition coils directly it says. They must be using the full H-bridge to drive the IAC stepper motor. I can't find a pinout for the MS3, so I'm honestly not sure how many outputs it can drive. My point is, the LT5 consumes a ton of outputs, even if you run it in "stock" fuel/ignition config. And up to 10 more outputs if you want to do 16 sequential injectors, and 8 COP ignition. That's very hard to find in a budget ECU. Todd Pepmeier, Pepmeier Engine Development (pepmeierengines@yahoo.com) |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
oh, and if not using the stock IM, you'll need another low-side driver to drive the tachometer.
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Freescale MC9S12X 16 bit, 50 MHz asymmetrical dual core processor 10 saturated injector drivers 8 logic level ignition outputs 3 high current (5 amp) general purpose outputs ? 2 can be reconfigured as additional injector drivers, and all can be used as PWM outputs 3 medium current (3 amp), high frequency general purpose outputs All unused injector and ignition outputs can be used as spare on/off or other outputs. This ECU has a LOT of I/O! 1 stepper H-bridge driver Camshaft and crankshaft differential inputs ? supports VR, Hall effect, and optical input 12 volt tach output Fuel pump output 8 analog inputs (5 dedicated sensor inputs, 3 spare/general purpose) 4 spare digital on/off inputs 3 spare digital frequency inputs 2 knock sensor inputs RS232, USB 2.0, and CAN communication Onboard 8 gigabyte SD card for internal data logging Internal ECU temperature sensor Real time clock Temperature range: -30 to +80 degrees C (-40 to +85 without battery for real time clock) |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Curious if any of the guys who bought one of these got the pinout along with it? I haven't matched up the I/O spork provided, but on the surface it doesn't seem like enough outputs. A LT5 version pinout would help, but I'm guessing there had to be some output devices not supported (AIR, CCP, CARS, etc.), which is understandable.
Todd |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
the reason for doing this isn't just to replace the DIS, it's to offer better control over the engine, dual widebands, flex fuel, and superior ignition. The stock system will do everything needed, but the aftermarket ecms are much faster and offer many superior tuning capabilities. Like the harley guys say, if I have to explain you wouldn't understand |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
I run the manufacturing engineering department in a facility that designs and builds our own engines. From air cooled horizontally opposed carbureted engines to mechanical fuel injected engines, to liquid cooled 4 cylinder direct injection diesel engines to 2 stroke multi-fuel single cylinder drone engines, to our certified TEO-540-C1A electronically controlled engines with an ECU that rivals the cost of your ZR-1. I understand exactly what you can do with expensive ECUs from arguably some of the worlds best ECU manufacturers. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
dayuum, I'm sorry, didn't mean to come across too nasty. I'm trying to prep the car for a twin turbo setup and the MS3 pro will work. secret I believe is to keep the stocker ecm, and just take away the engine management functions cutting into the wiring like we do on the c5 it's not trivial, but the MS3pro with a standar wiring harness starts around 1300 so it's not super expensive. For my "use case" I have a Haltech platinum s2000 ecm with dual wb and 8 channel egt that actually would be a better candidate, and fully capable of running the engine, drive 8 coils, and do everything I need. Plus it's paid for. Soooo what I really need is someone who undertands the wiring like the back of their hand. The tech support from Haltech is fantastic and they provide exactly how to "cut it in" and piggy back the haltech along side the factory ecm but with the new gauge packages, and things available, not really sure I care about any of the stocker gauges. The virtual stuff when setup right provides all critical engine info at a glance along with logging and playback functions. very cool stuff. see the new haltech nexus. they are doing some pretty innovative stuff with the can bus and power management now. my old haltech also has an amp driver box so I can control the alchy injection pump. I'm looking to stuff some alchy shots down the old gals throat and do dual fuel. pump gas for most off boost and alchy for everything above say around 4 psi or so. Might not do intercooling as the alchy does a good job of that and it saves some hassle and plumbing. So here's a relatively "easy" experiment that I'm wanting to try. Leave the stock ecm dis and all that stuff "as is" with a custom tune and "layer in the sweetness" of another set of injectors running e85 served up by a hobbs switch triggering the other dedicated ecm to come online both tunes will have to be manipulated together but it's essentially just an (AIC - additional injector controller) which is pretty easy to do with a custom intake. So I'm looking to take a baby step toward the twin turbo with the right octane fuel to feed the beast and not be quite so complicated to lash up. the two computers don't know about each other so the stock driveability and ignition control isn't impacted at all. and when the boost comes on, a stiff drink is served up. I'd never cut up my bifurcation intake that lpe did for me (maybe it was graham!!_) but it can be done pretty easy with a high rise hood and my hood needs to go on a diet (got a big scratch on it too@) just musing a bit, maybe graham will chime in on tuning the TT with the Linc AIC setup As I recall they let the stock ecm control the primary (like in key off mode) and had the link do the squirts on the big side with a larger injector smart man that graham might be time to dust off some of that wisdom the integration is SOOOO much easier and the functionality is what I'm after the dual wb and egts to help trim each cyl and give it what it wants and needs can't do that with a stocker ecm and you guys are right, the DIS panic is over rated, they don't fail often Only dis issue I had was with my old "wolf" 93 LPE 475 car, it had upgraded rods, pistons with the stocker liners and was a joy to drive that car had to sit outside and the dis would code and complain and the car would run like crap until it warmed up if I kept in the garage it never had the issue It was just hating the other 2 Zs that I had at the time that were the garage queens ohhh to go back to those days when 3 Zs were mine!! I took 2 of them out and "racing against my own car" with my buddy driving. DRM vs 95 with 4.10s and headers dead heat with the win going to the best bulb We hot lapped those cars until we got too tired to make any more runs |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
I would still like to quantify if there is anything to be gained w CnP on an LT5 w typical mods, ie cams, porting exhaust.
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Are you going to respond to me????????????????? |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
The ignition is not a limiting factor on making power within the realm of what is considered standard modifications on an LT5. You are not limited by the ability to modify the ignition outputs. These engines are not known for weak ignition, or a high rate of coil failure due to heat, or any issues you might alleviate by moving the coil closer to the plug or out in the open. The megasquirt is capable of handling ignition timing changes for boosted applications. The only real advantage would be the ability to adjust timing by cylinder, which isn't going to do much for LT5 people at the power levels we're looking at. You would have additional diagnostics ability by utilizing sequential fuel injection in conjunction with CoP, but that's a nice to have, not a necessity. You could possibly do some fine tuning to decrease emissions as well, but I don't think that's a big ask as a car in good condition passes current emissions standards. I think there is a general misconception about what drove OEMs to CoP to begin with. Reliability, fuel efficiency and emissions. Not power. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
My response to you was an straight up inquiry.Its unfortunate if you took it as anything else. I was simply asking for any evidence or experience you may have for your statement. If you have either or both I would be appreciative of your sharing it. Could save me time and effort.
Quote:
|
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Quote:
Aside from the emissions and diagnostic benefits noted above, the only other compelling reason to go to individual coil ignition is a situation where the engine speed is high enough (and coil dwell long enough) that there is not enough time to fully charge the coils. That isn't remotely a problem for the LT5 coils at the engine speeds we run. Apologies to the OP for getting this thread slightly off his original topic. Always happy to discuss further in another thread, or this one too. Todd |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
you can make all the power you want with all stock stuff, no need to ever innovate or use faster processors, EGT, dual WB or tune by cyl, just keep the car stock if that floats your boat, not me.
when you start to increase cyl pressures, run E85, and push the limits, I'd rather have a more advanced engine management system than what GM did back in the 80s Nothing wrong with it, but it's not up to par with current technology on many levels. the stock system has been proven to support up to 700 hp and works just fine up to that and beyond. but there are NO safeguards on par with what the MS3 pro or other systems or advanced individual cyl tuning like aftermarket systems have the ability to do. Integration will be a huge PITA and indeed NOT worth it to most. for normally aspirated, clearly gains would be not worth the squeeze. Tuning with the stock stuff is not a limiting factor until you get to the limits which are beyond where most have been. Thanks for your thoughts. |
Re: Megasquirt? What's the Situation?
Ron,
Our community hasn?t gotten to where it has w 30yo technology by not pushing the envelope or adhering to common wisdom. The LT5 is very much a DIY project which is one of the characteristics that attracted me to it. And our ZRs are very much an expression of ourselves especially on the Registry. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025