ZR-1 Net Registry Forums - View Single Post

kcl98 · 01-06-2012

Lee,

No - that was with the ported stock plenum and injector housings - currently on the car - exactly the way it was when it ran the 10.44 back in October. I surmise the dyno backs up the track performance. I'd think 580-585 would be possible with the Hogan from my prior experience, but I'd probably lose about 15 ft-lbs on the torque. I think that's a better match for a traditional 6-spd, but with my auto & the wide ratio gears, I think the tradeoff might be a push at the track. It probably would trap out a little higher with the Hogan, but I'm not sure the ET would change much.

I do expect to be at BG - knock on wood, nothing goes wrong!

Kevin

01-06-2012	#3
kcl98 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Chicago Posts: 45	Re: 441 cid dyno results Lee, No - that was with the ported stock plenum and injector housings - currently on the car - exactly the way it was when it ran the 10.44 back in October. I surmise the dyno backs up the track performance. I'd think 580-585 would be possible with the Hogan from my prior experience, but I'd probably lose about 15 ft-lbs on the torque. I think that's a better match for a traditional 6-spd, but with my auto & the wide ratio gears, I think the tradeoff might be a push at the track. It probably would trap out a little higher with the Hogan, but I'm not sure the ET would change much. I do expect to be at BG - knock on wood, nothing goes wrong! Kevin