Thread: secondarries
View Single Post
Old 03-31-2013   #44
RHanselman
 
RHanselman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cresson, TX
Posts: 970
Default Re: secondarries

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
Thanks for posting the graph Paul.

If you notice it has 25 more torque across the whole graph w/no secondaries.
You guys are saying from 1000 rpm it would spike up and at 2000rpm it smooths out.
So the graph would look like this.
Nope, I'm not saying anything. Just passing along a data-point that the MS guys experienced during tuning my stock car. I'd like to find out if it's true.

Pete, I think you meant: "if you notice it has 25 more torque across the whole graph w/no secondaries AND PORTING"... By the graph it's unclear as to what mod caused the increase in TQ. Port could have made it all or they could have a ratio.

Paul, go out and put your secondaries back in real quick like and get us some numbers! In jest of course...

Cheers,
R
__________________
Ron Hanselman
Founding Member #80
CM Lifetime Member #1093

1991 #383 Twin Turbo
1993 #099 Ruby, Jeal 368 w/Snake Skinner body
1961 White with Red Int
RHanselman is offline   Reply With Quote