ZR-1 Net Registry Forums - View Single Post

Schrade · 11-15-2013

Still thinkin' on this throttle hesitation here...

If [since] 80% throttle opening comes from ONLY [ < 20%, actually] physical Range Of Motion OF THROTTLE LINKAGE ...

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-D.../HPIM7334c.JPG

then EVERY operational parameter has almost 0 tolerance for deviation, from 0% Throttle Opening, to 80% Throttle Opening, when 80% throttle is reached in such a short span.

There HAS TO be some 'buffer' integrated into all parameters' sync'ing properly; otherwise, every 1 year-old LT5 with even minor hardware degradation is gonna' have some problem...

such as 'Off-Idle Sag'

unless the potentiometer in the TPS has some buffer mechanism built-in, such as logarithmic resistance, and not linear (never mind just now that FSM says that the TPS Voltage response is linear..................... )

This make any sense to anyone?

11-15-2013	#234
Schrade Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: NC Posts: 1,783	Re: TOP END REFINISHING Still thinkin' on this throttle hesitation here... If [since] 80% throttle opening comes from ONLY [ < 20%, actually] physical Range Of Motion OF THROTTLE LINKAGE ... https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-D.../HPIM7334c.JPG then EVERY operational parameter has almost 0 tolerance for deviation, from 0% Throttle Opening, to 80% Throttle Opening, when 80% throttle is reached in such a short span. There HAS TO be some 'buffer' integrated into all parameters' sync'ing properly; otherwise, every 1 year-old LT5 with even minor hardware degradation is gonna' have some problem... such as 'Off-Idle Sag' unless the potentiometer in the TPS has some buffer mechanism built-in, such as logarithmic resistance, and not linear (never mind just now that FSM says that the TPS Voltage response is linear..................... ) This make any sense to anyone? Last edited by Schrade; 11-15-2013 at 11:57 AM.