View Single Post
Old 03-30-2016   #10
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
Default Re: SLP cold air intake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobob View Post
Here is the old post from the CF. Results for peak HP were within margin of error but notice the average HP and Torque numbers show a small gain.


Today myself and forum member/dyno owner TJ Wong set out to find the truth regarding C4 air intakes. We dyno tested 3 different air intakes on my Lingenfelter 368cid LT5. Tested today were: stock with paper element, stock with K&N element and a cut lid, and finally SLP's "claw" tri-cone filter design. All dyno pulls were made with starting coolant temps at 195 degrees F. Here are the results.

Stock with paper, two identical pulls: 477rwhp. Avg. peak HP 477

Stock with K&N and cut lid, three pulls: 471, 475, 480rwhp. Avg. peak HP 475.3

SLP tri-cone "claw", three pulls: 477, 478, 481rwhp. Avg. peak HP 478.7

It would appear that the naysayers are mostly correct about C4 air intakes, not much to be gained here. Both Tom and I were rather suprised with the results. We had expected to see some small but visible gains with the cut-lid and SLP, instead we got a bunch of tests with peak numbers being basically the same or well within normal dyno pull to pull variation. The SLP unit does seem to have a small advantage over the others but suprisingly it's in mid range power not peak (see dyno graph average power #'s).



Bob,

It would be interesting to see if anything changes regarding the AFR with these.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote