![]() |
#11 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 2,704
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]()
Darn!
16hp is pretty impressive from just an exhaust. Were the two pulls made on the same day. If not, is this data SAE-corrected or standard-corrected?
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 2,704
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: north of montreal
Posts: 510
|
![]()
i originally installed a borla cat-back system,2 1/2"...then i heard about the restrictions inside the pipes,apparently there to cut down on interior resonnance...so i decided to make my owm,with help from some friends..we installed 2 1/2" pipes from the cats,removed the resonator and put an x pipe in its place,and installed back the borla mufflers...we did not dynoed the car before or after,but the gain in power was really noticeable...the sound is deep and mellow,and i didnt notice any resonnance inside,at any rpm
blackjack 91-1735 4:10 , lucas injectors,fidanza flywheel(noisy) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]() Quote:
I was wondering if those two dyno pulls were done on the same day? If not, can you say if the data is either SAE-corrected or standard-corrected?
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 2,704
|
![]()
It's not my dyno run, though the labels for the Y-axis' both say "SAE corrected" on them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Niceville
Posts: 1,001
|
![]()
Sorry for the delay. I have my kids for Christmas and we're on the go.
Hib, the car was totally stock. It was dyno'd about a week apart. The values were SAE corrected. Stock dynos were done six times and they never varied more than 2 hp. The modified (exhaust only) dynos were done six times and it gained about 2.5 hp per pull. After six we quit. I drove it straight from the muffler shop to the dyno. The temp varied slightly but I don't remember which way (1st to 2nd). The water temps were fairly controlled but it climbed as the day went. Ted |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
|
![]()
if i can ask hib if he has given thought to that ultra flow-x . they say its an x pipe in a muffler . I always hear that an x pipe gives alot of resonance. I amnot that knowledgeable but i just got back from having 410s put in as well as ported inj and plenum as well as a tune on the car instead of just ordering a chip that got13 hpextra . Since I have a complete flowmaster system I am very interested if i could gget an extra 10-15 out of her .She is at 409.9 rwhp 373 tq now . But 425 out of a stk motor with the above mods would be would be a dream come true. please advise as to my best path. any advise is much apprieated
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]() Quote:
If this is correct, may I ask what facility did the dynamometer tests and are the numbers SAE-corrected, standard-corrected or raw data?
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|