![]() |
#71 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]()
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
I'm thinking about going on the 1st if anybody wants to meet me there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Calif
Posts: 16
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,093
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Calif
Posts: 16
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 132
|
![]()
I changed out the O2 sensors, engine oil, and went to the smog place recommended by my mechanic with the engine hot and I passed!! I don't think the O2 sensors did anything for NOx. The 25 MPH measurement actually went up from 459 PPM to 519 PPM. The average is 223 PPM. If anyone knows why my NOx is still so high and how I could get it down, I'm really curious to know. All of the other measured numbers are all below the average.
I think what made the difference is not anything I did to the car but in the values entered for the smog test! The previous smog place put "CORVETTE" instead of "CORVETTE ZR1" as the Model. They also entered this as a "California" instead of "Federal" car in the Certification field. Entering these values correctly actually raised the NOx MAX levels from 545 PPM to 757 PPM (for 15 MPH) and from 502 PPM to 696 PPM (for 25 MPH). The passing report is below: ![]()
__________________
1991 ZR-1 #405 (white/black with blue pin stripes) Last edited by Okiedoke; 02-25-2015 at 03:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 193
|
![]()
Hummm...... interesting......
Glad you passed ![]()
__________________
1990 ZR-1 #642 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,786
|
![]() Quote:
As for the high Nox. Probably a small vacuum leak or old catalysts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Calif
Posts: 16
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Okiedoke;220729]I changed out the O2 sensors, engine oil, and went to the smog place recommended by my mechanic with the engine hot and I passed!! I don't think the O2 sensors did anything for NOx. The 25 MPH measurement actually went up from 459 PPM to 519 PPM. The average is 223 PPM. If anyone knows why my NOx is still so high and how I could get it down, I'm really curious to know. All of the other measured numbers are all below the average.
I think what made the difference is not anything I did to the car but in the values entered for the smog test! The previous smog place put "CORVETTE" instead of "CORVETTE ZR1" as the Model. They also entered this as a "California" instead of "Federal" car in the Certification field. Entering these values correctly actually raised the NOx MAX levels from 545 PPM to 757 PPM (for 15 MPH) and from 502 PPM to 696 PPM (for 25 MPH). I'm curious how the smog guy got away with using Federal instead of California certification. It's a Ca car is it not? The 49 state Federal standards are no doubt less strict than Ca. which is potentialil why the Max limits were higher, about what they used to be in Ca. I sure hope you actually get your registration and that I can convince a local guy to do the same. Gary Last edited by glkuntz; 02-26-2015 at 01:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
![]() Join Date: May 2013
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 515
|
![]()
Would the difference be that cars SOLD in CA would be equipped somewhat differently than cars sold in the other states and therefore would have different emission requirements? For example I once saw a CA car that had 2 evap canisters in it vs the same model non CA that only had one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|