ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-08-2015   #13
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
Default Re: Whats Next?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLSHOTS View Post
I feel like we're really hijacking Lee's thread here, but...

An LT1, without forced induction and with the stock cam but with head porting, aftermarket intake manifold and TB, catless headers and x-pipe, as well as computer and fueling mods, can definitely achieve similar numbers. In fact, with a meager investment of about $1000 in a Borla X-pipe, a flex-fuel kit and a tune and a tank of E85, an LT1 can easily exceed 500 crank HP.
Yeah-but!! Ya forgot to mention purchasing the LT1 initially (might add a few $$), ADD to that the computer and wire harness, interfacing it (?) with the CCM, etc., swapping it with the LT5, AND then whatever mods to then get the LT1 to 500+ NA...stuff like that.

Review & Re-focusing:
  1. The "state-of-the-art" for a street-driven, stock-bottom/cammed LT5 is (already) 510+ chp
  2. Cammed but still streetable the 350 cid LT5 is about 557 chp (Pete's example)
  3. The single runner, cammed Phase-II 350 cid LT5 made approx. 550 chp
  4. 540 chp is readily available w/ stock cammed LT5s sporting 368 cid (10 cid less than that LT1 example)
An improvement over these (above) established benchmarks would have to be approx 10%+ in order to clearly put the results above questions arising from test-related variances. In that regard, (as I see it) Lee's experiment started out in the hole, relative to currently established benchmarks (above).

ITB, split plenum, or some other established NA approach may yield that 10% NA improvement (from air induction only) are possibilities with results yet to be seen(?).

The elephant(s) in the room is forced induction - above displacement. Not dismissing displacement or the chance for eking out a few more ponies from NA, but what interests me is exploring a "cost efficient" blueprint to a SC for the LT5.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLSHOTS View Post
I was just reading last night about a similarly-modded Stingray on drag slicks dropping into the 10s.
And, (with all due respect) far as time-slip comparisons go; comparing different cars, different weights and weight distribution, different displacement, different gearing, etc, in attempt to make a comparison between the new LT1 and LT5 all combine to (as statisticians say) "increase the % of ambiguity to the point of irrelevance" (at least as far as this tread goes).

Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025