|
![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 2,704
|
![]()
I'm no expert, but I've heard tailpipe widebands read lean by about half a point or so? So it might not be quite as bad as the 13.9-14:1 seems to indicate.
Also, wouldn't you lose a little power richening it up (though gain a huge margin of safety)? All I mean is a non-crap tune might not improve the power, though it certainly looks like it would be a good idea. ![]() So do you have headers or what? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
yes I am runnning Watson headers.
LGAFF 92 ZR1 #234 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
|
![]()
I think his car being that lean would cost power. it looks way lean , it would be fun to see what happens when they add fuel .if i had to guess 410to the wheels .but i am no expert
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]() Quote:
The best place for a WB is in the collector next to the NB sensor. I think next time I go to the dyno, I'll have my ZT-2 hooked up. Be an interesting comparison between the tailpipe and the collector. My first run on thedyno showed a 13.4:1 AFR. Dropping that to 12.8 did nothing for power either way but a bit more peace of mind in case of bad gas for example. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|