|
![]() |
#1 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,624
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson 90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]()
No doubt in my mind that $4$, the LS7 is hard to beat for mods. You start out at 505hp, headers and a tune and you're looking 550 at the crank. I have a friend with a Silver 07 Z in that configuration. Not to mention it looks like a Great White coming up on your 6 when viewed in the rearview mirror. For a 5.7L, the LT-5 responds incredibly well to even small mods like porting and better exhaust. So the potential is there but the
OHV v OHC differential will always be low end torque which the LS-7 has in spades. Of course, we'll need to see what Todd has cooked up with his 427. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]()
It is becoming obvious that the torque curves on the LT5s are characteristically flatter over all, and especially at the high end. (See how for the most part the LT5s hp is more or less flat going into 7000 rpm, even on stock cams?)
The trouble with "peak" hp and torque numbers is, well, they're "peaky". The greater area under the curve(s) makes more sense when evaluating usable output. Just food for thought. P. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]() Quote:
As for $/hp, argument, to get from a stock LT5 to a 427 LT5 it could be said that the $$ it would cost today to sell a stock ZR-1 and purchase a C6 Z06 would be pretty close, if not in favor of the LT5. (However, the $$ outlay could be substantially cheaper for the LT5 if you do most of you own work.) So, once you have arrived at displacement parity, let the mod vs mod comparisons begin! But, that said, the C6 Z06 option also brings with it a modern performance chassis - sporting an aluminum frame and some titanium here and there too. Add to that the new fuel economy requirements and the C6 Z06 with all the trimmings (LS7) may become history and thus one day be the apple of the eye to those like us ZR-1 nuts that appreciate those "pinnacle" examples of Corvettes. So, maybe now would be the time to buy one al la the L88s of their day? Back to the topic, Marc advertises a 415 LT5 package that makes 600+ hp. I found a dyno graph of such an engine on his web page, and compared to the LS7 architecture, the differences are striking and quite exciting especially when considering there is still a 12 ci disadvantage to the 415 motor! ![]() ![]() It begs one to wonder what might have been possible were there big inch heads available for the LT5, where the practical rpm limits might have been...doanit! ![]() I believe this pair of graphs makes the point that Bob G is talking about when he describes the reason why it takes 25+ hp "peak" advantage over an LT5 car for the LS cars to be competitive. All very interesting... P. Last edited by Paul Workman; 01-16-2011 at 09:10 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cedar Hill, Texas
Posts: 154
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() It was too good of a deal to pass up. All she needs is paint! It's a 64 SS Nova with a "tiny" 406cu small block. Supposedly it's running the 1/4 mile in the 8.80's but I'll confirm that in the spring ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]()
You boys need to remember the LS7 has 77 more cubes.
Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|