|
![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 308
|
![]()
So, Todd, your results suggest that driveline loss is closer to a fixed number (approximately 50 for our cars?) rather than a percentage of FWHP. Correct? Awesome numbers, btw!
__________________
'95 ZR-1, aqua/gray, #167 368 LPE/Haibeck, Web cams, Stainless Works headers, B&B Fusion exhaust, 18" Fikse wheels, Alcon brakes, lowered. 491 SAE RWHP. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]()
WOW,nice job
![]() I just have a couple questions since you don't have corrected numbers then maybe you should dyno in the summer on a 100 degree day with 100% Humidity and tell us what the numbers are on that day. This is why we have corrected. Dennis,something is going on with the fuel or wideband? Show me your 1/4 MPH i'll tell you your corrected WHP. ![]() Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]()
Very interesting article on parasitic losses. I don’t believe u can have a fixed loss # regardless of power. More power=more heat which = greater loss. Plus there’s a difference between steady state and one where u are constantly accelerating which is typical for chassis dyno.
Not disputing Todd’s observations, but I gotta think GM has seen enough of this stuff to make an “educated” guess. Anyway, here’s a good read. http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...in-power-loss/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|