![]() |
#71 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 7,165
|
![]()
How is the new ECM coming along?
Is it playing nice with the CCM?
__________________
1990 Corvette ZR-1 #1051 Watson Headers (2" Primary) - Flowmaster Cats - Borla Catback Late Model IH - Plenum Coilovers - 4.10s Shelby Series 1 - Wilwood Brakes Custom Interior NCM Lifetime Member #978 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,466
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 7,165
|
![]()
NAH, more curious on the ECM piece of it honestly..
Although a TT would be nice
__________________
1990 Corvette ZR-1 #1051 Watson Headers (2" Primary) - Flowmaster Cats - Borla Catback Late Model IH - Plenum Coilovers - 4.10s Shelby Series 1 - Wilwood Brakes Custom Interior NCM Lifetime Member #978 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cresson, TX
Posts: 970
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the ECM is talking to the CCM. They've only sent test data between the two just to verify the connection and format. They'll work the packets next. Confidence is real high that this will not be an issue. Corey Henderson spent some significant time with them discussing some particulars. We had some concerns on the 1990 MY (just for you Brett) because of the differences in Spark Control. We want to make sure this thing works with all years straight from the box... The first ECM is going to Ron Bidwell and his car is a 1990. Corey will confirm all the functions and then tune for the twin turbo. We are still a few months from completion. I think we (Ron, Corey and Megasquirt) would like to have all completed before BG. I have my fingers crossed! Cheers, Ron
__________________
Ron Hanselman Founding Member #80 CM Lifetime Member #1093 1991 #383 Twin Turbo 1993 #099 Ruby, Jeal 368 w/Snake Skinner body 1961 White with Red Int |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cresson, TX
Posts: 970
|
![]()
Car is still on the Dyno however they haven't ran it for a few weeks. The software guys are trying to improve on the way the secondaries sequence in. They don't like the way GM did it... I guess it will take a firmware change from what I'm hearing. So now it's in the software engineers court.
Cheers, Ron
__________________
Ron Hanselman Founding Member #80 CM Lifetime Member #1093 1991 #383 Twin Turbo 1993 #099 Ruby, Jeal 368 w/Snake Skinner body 1961 White with Red Int |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nichols, FL
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
Tyler |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]() Quote:
R U saying Todd runs both injectors even at Closed Throttle? Stock code allows both injector ON after what is defined Closed Throttle in the cal. What would be the benefit of running both injectors, at half value, for idle? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nichols, FL
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
My car calibration runs both injectors at all times. Throttle plates are removed. With the code mod you cannot jump back and forth. It does not matter whether you run one or 2 injectors you adjust the calibration in the code to meter whatever fuel is necessary, WOT or idle. Tyler Last edited by Tyler Townsley; 03-11-2013 at 11:26 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]() Quote:
I just want to understand what would be the benefit of running both injectors at Closed Throttle. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nichols, FL
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|